TechSkeptic sent me a link to Winston Wu's supposed Debunking the Arguments of Paranormal Skeptics and Debunkers, asking me if we should consider rebutting it. I'd seen Wu's piece before and had forgotten about it until TechSkeptic's email. I knew a comprehensive rebuttal to it had already been written. The rebuttal didn't come up easily on any web searches though, so I thought it needed publicizing.
Winston Wu's fallacy ridden piece has been on the web for some time now, and it gets no better with re-reading. Wu was so impressed with himself for writing it that he even turned up on the JREF Forum some years ago to promote himself. Read the actual thread started by Winston Wu; marvel at how he continues to insist he is winning the argument, long after his ass has been handed to him on a silver platter.
Anyway, the comprehensive rebuttal to Winston Wu (.pdf) was written by Paul Sandoval, and is hosted by Skeptic Report. It's necessarily long and detailed (as is the piece it rebuts), but it's all there if you have the time. Sandoval's piece is also a fine example of how to expose logical fallacies in someone else's argument, if you're unfamiliar with the subject.