Hard to know where to start with this anti-evolution article in the weekly standard. There's hardly a sentence in it that doesn't contain errors or outright lies.
Fortunately Jason at Evolutionblog takes it apart. What more can I say?
« Understanding Scientology | Main | Acupuncture does not cut blood pressure »
March 28, 2005
The comments to this entry are closed.
Categories
- Alternative Medicine (83)
- Anti-Vaccination Hysteria (61)
- Astrology (29)
- Cults (16)
- Economics and Politics (8)
- Environment (5)
- Evolution / Intelligent Design (76)
- Fallacies (13)
- General Skepticism (60)
- Genetic Engineering (15)
- Golden Woos (4)
- Humor (48)
- Other Blog Carnivals (10)
- Paranormal and New Age (140)
- Recommended Books / DVDs (3)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Idiocy (116)
- Science (14)
- Site Admin (6)
- Skeptics' Circle (103)
Classic Skeptico Posts
- Acupuncture is a placebo
- Astrology fails when tested
- Be Open-Minded
- Crop Circles
- Deepak Chopra drivel
- Detox diets
- Five apples
- How do you prove photography to a blind man?
- Nostradumass
- Play "Psychic" Bingo!
- Prayer still useless
- Pretty Soon
- Reincarnation all over again
- The Astrology Challenge
- The Incredible Shrinking God
- The Secret
- UFOs
- What the (Bleep)!?
Recent Posts
- Why Religion Really Doesn’t Have the Upper Hand over Science
- Seralini Study Withdrawn – Should Never Have Been Published
- The Seralini Rule
- RFK Jr: Government Scientists are Lying
- Sylvia Browne Wrong / Psychics Useless Again
- Is “Right To Know” about GMOs the same as “Teach the Controversy”?
- David Dilworth - Dishonest and a Liar. Also Still Wrong
- Incorrectly Calling Logical Fallacies
- The Golden Woos #4
- Andrew Brown fails to understand the rules of secular debate
Comments