« Burden of proof | Main | Skeptics’ Circle #7 »

April 27, 2005


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Whoa...he is not a major ID proponent. He's a flaky little twit of no consequence, remarkable for the fact that Nature saw fit to make him the center of the piece.

I expect them to do a feature on In Christ Dougie Bender next. (and if you've never heard of him, no surprise--he's just another in the legion of slow-witted religionists who have jumped on the ID bandwagon.)

My favourite quote was from a recent article about the creationist nonsense happening in Dover, PA:

"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture," - pastor Ray Mummert, creationist.

You should probably remove the claim that he is a major ID proponent if he isn't. There's no need to try to villify the whole group just because one of them is an idiot. That would be a common falicy and something that people often do to the skeptic movement.

In reality, doesn't the fact that they are proponets of ID go a long, long way towards making them idiots themselves? They do as much to villify themselves as any one skeptic ever did.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search site