ID just is not science

PZ Meyers writing in the excellent Pharyngula (and an op-ed in the Star Tribune), explains simply and clearly why ID isn’t science.

Unfortunately the Tribune also has a piece by a cretinist (not a typo) in the interests of “balance”. Fortunately PZ takes that apart too.

If you want to understand the vacuousness that is ID compared with real science like the theory of evolution, and the dishonest arguments put forward by the ID proponents, I highly recommend reading these two items.

They’re good even if you already understand these issues.

Comments

[Ecks Ridgehead]

Thanks for those links - very useful.