« The appeal to be open-minded | Main | Intelligent Design as good as Astrology »
October 19, 2005
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Categories
- Alternative Medicine (83)
- Anti-Vaccination Hysteria (61)
- Astrology (29)
- Cults (16)
- Economics and Politics (6)
- Environment (5)
- Evolution / Intelligent Design (76)
- Fallacies (13)
- General Skepticism (60)
- Genetic Engineering (15)
- Golden Woos (4)
- Humor (48)
- Other Blog Carnivals (10)
- Paranormal and New Age (140)
- Recommended Books / DVDs (3)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Idiocy (116)
- Science (14)
- Site Admin (6)
- Skeptics' Circle (103)
Classic Skeptico Posts
- Acupuncture is a placebo
- Astrology fails when tested
- Be Open-Minded
- Crop Circles
- Deepak Chopra drivel
- Detox diets
- Five apples
- How do you prove photography to a blind man?
- Nostradumass
- Play "Psychic" Bingo!
- Prayer still useless
- Pretty Soon
- Reincarnation all over again
- The Astrology Challenge
- The Incredible Shrinking God
- The Secret
- UFOs
- What the (Bleep)!?
Recent Posts
- Why Religion Really Doesn’t Have the Upper Hand over Science
- Seralini Study Withdrawn – Should Never Have Been Published
- The Seralini Rule
- RFK Jr: Government Scientists are Lying
- Sylvia Browne Wrong / Psychics Useless Again
- Is “Right To Know” about GMOs the same as “Teach the Controversy”?
- David Dilworth - Dishonest and a Liar. Also Still Wrong
- Incorrectly Calling Logical Fallacies
- The Golden Woos #4
- Andrew Brown fails to understand the rules of secular debate
That would have shortened the Scopes trial a bit
Posted by: | October 19, 2005 at 08:18 AM
Please stand by. BronzeDog's comments will be posted after he changes his boxers and manages to stop his involuntary diaphragm spasms long enough to get his blood's oxygen level back to normal.
Posted by: BronzeDog | October 19, 2005 at 08:29 AM
Now that Behe himself has admitted in the Dover trial that in order for ID to qualify as a scientific theory, the very definition of what constitutes a scientific theory would have to be so broad and weak as to include astrology, isn't it past time for this nonsense to JUST GO AWAY? Honestly, what's left BUT baseball bats?
Posted by: Martin Wagner | October 20, 2005 at 09:44 AM