« 72nd Skeptics’ Circle | Main | Homeopathy – Still Doesn’t Work »

October 29, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jim,
God is capitalized. If you don't respect Him, He won't respect you on judgement day.
Show me that any of you nitwits can do a better job of handicapping horses if you want to prove your point that it is not the highest intellectual pursuit that exists.
Edsel's did not exist before Ford built them, same thing with Eli Lilly causing autism. You'r ereading too much junk from nitwits who want to make the drug comoanies look innocent. They aren't.
Coverups are different than conspiracies. Calling me a conspiracy nutcase means you lose since you had to resort to name calling and lying. I answered your 20 questions. If you didn't understand the answers, too bad.

Best:

God is capitalized. If you don't respect Him, He won't respect you on judgement day.

I think I will get over it. What with him not existing. I mean really, do you even understand what an atheist is?

Show me that any of you nitwits can do a better job of handicapping horses if you want to prove your point that it is not the highest intellectual pursuit that exists.

You really are an idiot. Show me that you can land a manned mission on Mars. Show me that you can cure AIDs or Cancer. Show me that you can write better than Shakespeare. Show me that you can paint better than Van Gogh. Show me that you even understand what an intellectual pursuit is (I'll give you a clue, it has nothing to do with guessing who is going to win a race).

Edsel's did not exist before Ford built them, same thing with Eli Lilly causing autism. You'r ereading too much junk from nitwits who want to make the drug comoanies look innocent. They aren't.

But I'm illiterate? I did link to Deth's paper remember? Is he a nitwit? It was hosted on autism.com, are they nitwits? Best, your idea that Eli Lilly caused autism is completely debunked, you have had no answers for the criticism of your position on this other than to keep saying you are true. The findings in Deth's paper even debunk this position. In case you haven't read it Deth found that a large number of nuero-toxins caused the problem he thinks he has identified, not just mercury or thimerasol. He found that thimerasol had the greatest effect, but that lead or alcohol also had one.

If mercury prevents methylation, then it has always prevented methylation. Or are you now arguing that methylation and mercury didn't exist before Eli Lily invented them?

You are reading junk from morons with no clue, and then when you read scientific papers you don't even understand them, claim you do, and then claim the papers say something they clearly don't.

Where did any of the sources I have cited say the drug companies are innocent? Innocent of what anyway?

Coverups are different than conspiracies. Calling me a conspiracy nutcase means you lose since you had to resort to name calling and lying.

You are a stupid fuckwit. How's that for name calling? But just so we are clear, you started the name calling, you have resorted to it in almost every single post you have made.

Please do explain how a cover up is different to a conspiracy though, this should be no problem for an intellectual giant such as you.

I answered your 20 questions. If you didn't understand the answers, too bad.

You attempted to answer them. If you didn't understand the rebuttals, too bad. If you didn't understand the follow up questions, too bad. If you didn't understand the new questions, too bad.


Best, you lose because you have no evidence for your arguments, you have repeatedly lied about evidence and positions, you have absolutely failed to answer our questions, you have shown yourself to be woefully ignorant of just about anything you turn your hand to (except guessing on horses), you lose because even the researchers you cite don't say what you claim they say (Kanner and Deth).

Answer the new questions or shut up.

Address the rebuttals to your answers of the previous 20+ or shut up.

Answer the specific questions about the nature of your theory or shut up.

Now for your homework Bestie. See if you understood my lesson on comma splicing and independent clauses and apply it to the post above.

That's a lot simpler than methionine synthase of homocysteine using a methyl group from methylcobalamin. So let's see if you can get it.

Best i see that the correct 4 would have garnered you over 10k, What are the odds on that bet, do you know? (i don't)

actually nevermind for those races the odds were 1 in 3023 and some change. (if picking at random) so i guess it's a good bet (if i did pay out 10k and some change). Although i'd really need to know what the vigorish was and a bunch of other factors... i read bookkeepers can charge 14%, which is an obnoxious vigorish for a gamble. I prefer craps and roulette, where i can bring the vigorish well under 1%, personally. doesn't take any awesome amount of intellect, just understanding odds and how to progressively bet.

hrmph to horses.

I have an analogy for some people here. Best says he can handicap horses well. fine. So what if someone came up to best at a track meet and said "hey i have this great bettor system that i worked out, and hundreds of people are using it and it works great!"

What would best say? Probably "prove it."

I wonder why that is? why wouldn't you just take them at their word? obviously if hundreds of people are using the strategy and they are seeing results it means that the strategy is valid, right?

Or could it mean that they got lucky, or it is coincidence, or that the hundreds of people were already good at gambling and this system isn't really affecting their betting as much as the guy trying to sell it to you is saying...

hmmmmmmmmmm.

"Or could it mean that they got lucky, or it is coincidence, or that the hundreds of people were already good at gambling and this system isn't really affecting their betting as much as the guy trying to sell it to you is saying..."

Or the guy is full of shit and can't figure out that a few people getting lucky one day doesn't mean that everyone gets lucky all the time with the system. When he gets asked about how he knows the system works, he simply says stuff like "you don't know what you are talking about, you idiot" and then proceeds to obtusely point to things that actually refute the idea that the system works all while questioning the intelligence of everyone around him.


LOL, what a crap load. Sadly, idiots like him continue to affect the population at a whole. I just saw another woman on the news chelating her kids (and also sticking them in a hyperbaric chamber) to cure the autism that the nasty, horrible immunizations gave her kids (never mind there wasn't any thimerisol in them).

I always find it refreshing to run across other people who understand that autism is not caused by immunization and that everyone who believes this is crazy. I am 26 and have a 20 year old autistic brother. My mother believes with deeply religious conviction that his autism is my father's fault because he believed that their children should be inoculated against dangerous diseases and had both of us vaccinated, against her will. I mean, what an ass.

She knows "for sure" this is what caused his autism. These days, I hardly ever talk to her because the topic almost always comes up, and it is hard for me to cloak my contempt for such a profoundly stupid viewpoint. One of her favorite supporting points is to argue that the rate of autism has increased from no cases at the turn of the century, to bla cases in the 1950s, to such and such cases now. This drives me insane because I can't get it through to her that a) it didn't exist as a diagnosis until the forties, so of course there were "no" cases, b) population increase makes her numbers statistically insignificant, and c) it's not like people really understood it all that well then (or now, even) and were consistently diagnosing it properly, and d) mentally disabled people used to be hidden away in institutions or back rooms and not everyone wanted to talk about them.

SUCK IT, MOM!

Well, looks like a grammar question from someone Bestie described as functionally illiterate has scared him off.

How about something more your area of expertise Bestie? Since you are a true scientist and intellectual giant.

Please explain the difference between methylation and demethylation, and how they both relate to methylcobalamin as part of the methionine synthase of homocysteine. Cite your favourite paper if you need to.

Please explain what role methylcobalamin plays in the methionine synthase of homocysteine. Feel free to refer to this interesting paper if it helps.

Perhaps you could also explain why Deth makes no mention of the fact that inhibition of methionine synthase can lead to the degeneration of the spinal cord and/or megaloblastic anemia.

Did you know that methionine synthase can also be inactivated by exposure to nitrous oxide? Maybe dentists are actually the cause of autism, hey Bestie?

Can you also please explain what Arakawa's Syndrome II is? Just so we know how much research on all this you've done.

Here are a couple of hints. It is also sometimes known as Methionine synthase deficiency. It presents as:

This disorder causes neurological problems, including mental retardation, brain atrophy and ventricular dilation, myoclonus, hypotonia, and epilepsy.

It is also associated with growth retardation, megaloblastic anemia, pectus excavatum, scoliosis, vomiting, diarrhea, and hepatosplenomegaly. Inheritance is autosomal dominant.

Anything sound familiar there Bestie?

You're a dangerous idiot and an intellectual coward.

Well, it’s been over a month and it looks like John Best has given up trying to educate we mere mortals on the true causes of autism. I’ll just reiterate that Best was unable to explain how he knew his child’s improvement was due to the chelation (“Screw your DBCS's. I don't give a rat's ass about them” was his charming response) – and that is because there is no possible way he could know whether or not his child would have improved without the chelation.

In fact, the chelation almost certainly did not help. Just published is yet another new study that found no mercury – autism link. I’m happy to let Best’s words above speak for themselves. Nothing could more impressively demonstrate what an idiot Best is than the inane boasting drivel he so eloquently wrote down of his own free will. But I think it’s time to close this thread for comments. Enough is enough – even of the high comedy delivered to us by Mr Best.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search site